Hello,
after defining some new UNIX-Clients on our NetWorker Environment and backing up these systems, I noticed that the Index of the Savesets is still written to the old Client Indexfolder.
That means, the Index of the Savesets for the new Clients shows "0 records requiring 0 KB".
Attention: these Savesets were backed up until now as part of another Client Definition (which is still active).
I have to keep this "old" Client Definition because some other Savesets have still to be backed up by this Client.
The new Client Definitions are part of a Clusterenvironment and are bound to Virtual IP-Adresses/Resourcegroups in the Cluster. These Savesets/Filesystems are Part of the Resourcegroups must be backed up dependent of their location.
The question is, if I can somehow split or move only a part of the Index to the new Client.
So that in the future the Backup/Recover processes access the Index thru the new Client name, and no more thru the old one, like it does now.
Please feel free to ask for more information. Perhaps the story above is a littebit comlplicated.
Thanks for any answer.
Regards, Martin
after defining some new UNIX-Clients on our NetWorker Environment and backing up these systems, I noticed that the Index of the Savesets is still written to the old Client Indexfolder.
That means, the Index of the Savesets for the new Clients shows "0 records requiring 0 KB".
Attention: these Savesets were backed up until now as part of another Client Definition (which is still active).
I have to keep this "old" Client Definition because some other Savesets have still to be backed up by this Client.
The new Client Definitions are part of a Clusterenvironment and are bound to Virtual IP-Adresses/Resourcegroups in the Cluster. These Savesets/Filesystems are Part of the Resourcegroups must be backed up dependent of their location.
The question is, if I can somehow split or move only a part of the Index to the new Client.
So that in the future the Backup/Recover processes access the Index thru the new Client name, and no more thru the old one, like it does now.
Please feel free to ask for more information. Perhaps the story above is a littebit comlplicated.
Thanks for any answer.
Regards, Martin