I fully understand that VB was for accessing Win32 interfaces.
I am looking at the cost of businesses and individuals in being able to port skills and code to a different platform. Linux is a great OS. If Linux is going to compete with Microsoft (or attract Windows pros), it has to remove the barriers between the two systems. It is simply intelligent to make it easy for a Windows Programmer, IT Pro, or end-user to use Linux. If that means helping VB programmers write their code on the Linux platform, then Great!
From a technical geek perspective (I am one too!), it does not make sense, as you are saying. I fully agree that programmers need to adapt to changes and learn new technologies and techniques; even languages. However, VB programming is a great skill to have. Personally, I enjoy the capability to fluently type it and write code like it was my first language. How cool would it be to tell a manager that hey, I don't have to learn a new language to write code for this platform. Linux supports that too! Plus, VB is a great starter language, its inevitable that that programmer will likely pick up a book on Perl or Python and start coding it.
Its not necessarily the technical practicality I am arguing here. Its saving time, money, and generating the perception to corporate types that its worth the money to program for Linux. I have a real life example to support this.
So, yes, I strongly believe that VB has a place and the language and the large VB skill base out there should not be simply ditched just because Linux developers may say so. To learn a new language period costs a lot of time, heartache, and expense.
Making Linux a better OS and all that compatibility stuff is great and is the most important priority. But, this does not mean that the VB project will be favored over the other.
Gary
gwinn7
A+, N+, I+