I have an IP 500V2 that was on 8.1.69, with a UC module, and PRI phone service from TelePacific.
2 days ago I remotely upgraded it to 9.0.8 and had inbound/outbound calls working, the Voicemail Pro was answering calls, and users could check their VM.
Last night I upgraded them to 9.1.4, and that's when the stuff hit the fan. The VM Pro would not link up (I did not update the UC module to 9.0 or 9.1). I then decided to roll back to 9.0.8, which I did successfully.
The customer then informed me that they're not able to receive inbound calls, and could not make outbound calls. The phones say Waiting for Line. The trunk status shows no alarms, and the carrier says "No issues."
I did notice that when a call comes in on any of the DIDs a "Configuration" alarm says: "The following line had no incoming call route for a call. Line 5, Line Group ID: 131072, DDI: 06522" (I have a Monitor trace text doc attached)
What strikes me about that is the "DDI" of 06522. The actual main inbound number (omitting the area code) is 642-6522. Where does the 0 come from on that DDI? Why does that same DDI show up no matter what DID is called?
I have deleted the formerly working incoming call route, (both the correct route, and the "catch all" route with no actual incoming number listed in that field), rebuilt the route, rebooted the switch, powered the switch down for 20 minutes, and changed the destination for both routes to known working extensions.
Thoughts?
I'm going to site tomorrow to upgrade the UC module with the USB boot upgrade tool to 9.1, will bring the switch back to 9.1.4, and I'm sure that'll fix the VM link issue, but this DID one is weird.
All help is appreciated. I'll be monitoring this feed tonight to be ready for tomorrow. Thanks all!
2 days ago I remotely upgraded it to 9.0.8 and had inbound/outbound calls working, the Voicemail Pro was answering calls, and users could check their VM.
Last night I upgraded them to 9.1.4, and that's when the stuff hit the fan. The VM Pro would not link up (I did not update the UC module to 9.0 or 9.1). I then decided to roll back to 9.0.8, which I did successfully.
The customer then informed me that they're not able to receive inbound calls, and could not make outbound calls. The phones say Waiting for Line. The trunk status shows no alarms, and the carrier says "No issues."
I did notice that when a call comes in on any of the DIDs a "Configuration" alarm says: "The following line had no incoming call route for a call. Line 5, Line Group ID: 131072, DDI: 06522" (I have a Monitor trace text doc attached)
What strikes me about that is the "DDI" of 06522. The actual main inbound number (omitting the area code) is 642-6522. Where does the 0 come from on that DDI? Why does that same DDI show up no matter what DID is called?
I have deleted the formerly working incoming call route, (both the correct route, and the "catch all" route with no actual incoming number listed in that field), rebuilt the route, rebooted the switch, powered the switch down for 20 minutes, and changed the destination for both routes to known working extensions.
Thoughts?
I'm going to site tomorrow to upgrade the UC module with the USB boot upgrade tool to 9.1, will bring the switch back to 9.1.4, and I'm sure that'll fix the VM link issue, but this DID one is weird.
All help is appreciated. I'll be monitoring this feed tonight to be ready for tomorrow. Thanks all!