Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!

Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!

  • Congratulations Chriss Miller on being selected by the Tek-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

wait on

Status
Not open for further replies.

dorack

Technical User
Joined
Jun 10, 2008
Messages
3
Location
US
Hi,

small question :

is it possible to have this kind of expression or behavior :

"WAIT ON sig1 OR WAIT ON sig2;"


(i think "WAIT ON sig1, sig2;" process"WAIT ON sig1 AND WAIT ON sig2;").

I would like my process to continue as soon as a signal update...

Would be good if someone have an idea on that :)

Thanks for the time,

David.
 
if sig1 and sig2 are std_logic_vectors, I would just make a sig3 which is the concatenation:

sig3 <= sig1 & sig2;

Then just WAIT ON sig3;
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top