VPN Concentrator 3000 to 2600 and back to 3000?

[Tekmazter]

This my be a little confusing so please ask for additional info if needed.

I have a growing network which has now placed a server in a remote office location. I have VPN users which come into my concentrator at the HQ, but need access to the remote site server. My question is this ... if the tunnel for the remote site exists on the same concentrator as the vpn client that tunnels in, how do I route traffic over the lan-to-lan tunnel for the vpn client?

Currently my default gateway for all tunnels is a router [CISCO 3600]. My local LAN traffic can get to the remote site (I have routes in place on the 3600), but clients VPN'ing in automatically get assigned the router as the default gateway and can only get to the local LAN at HQ. It appears that I need to add additional routing (whether it be on the router or on the concentrator) to have their traffic find its way back to the remote site when going to their subnet)

Setup looks like this:

Site2Sites & VPN Clients -->[CONCENTRATOR CISCO 3000]-[CISCO 3600 ROUTER/default gateway]-LAN

Is it possible to do some type of reverse routing on either on the router?

 

[PeterHurst]

Well, I would have thought so but I haven't any experience of the 3000.

If it were a tunnel on a router I would have added the remote user's IP range to the access list defining the tunnel traffic (and consequently not being NATed)