Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!

Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!

  • Congratulations Wanet Telecoms Ltd on being selected by the Tek-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Swap file size recommendation

Status
Not open for further replies.

gramatoncleric

IS-IT--Management
Jan 6, 2005
35
US
What is the recommended swap file size when running XP pro on let's say a P4 2.4 ghz machine with 512 mb of ram? I know that windows can manage the swap file size. If I run a gig of memory shouldn't I limit how large I should let the swap file grow to by setting an initial and max size and what should these be for let's say 512MB of ram and what should it be for a gig of ram?

Scot Trodick
 
I second that what bcastner has stated...

on one of my system, I do have a swap file set at actually 2x (512mb = 1024mb) Fixed (Static) on a seperated partition, formated with FAT32...



Ben

If it works don't fix it! If it doesn't use a sledgehammer...
 
Hi, I knew that is was best to have 1.5X the amount of RAM fixed size on other partition than the system but:

Why FAT32? is there a reason i'm unaware of?

Hope this helps. Please let know if this resolve your issue

Jeff
 
Actually, at todays speed of Data Transfer between an HD and Mobo, it doesn't matter...
this is a left over from older days, where FAT was faster than NTFS...



Ben

If it works don't fix it! If it doesn't use a sledgehammer...
 
For small partitions one could still argue that the cluster size assignments given by FAT32 make the filestore in this situation more efficient in speed, and the overhead associated with NTFS in small partitions gives the edge to FAT32 in effective and usuable file space.

But this is for the real propeller-heads; it really would not matter in any practical way for you using either filestore.
 
And just to add to what Bill said... On larger partitions particularly over 80GB, NTFS actually gets a bit of the leaning edge in overall performance, which generally increases the higher you go.

~cdogg
[tab][navy]For general rules and guidelines to get better answers, click here:[/navy] faq219-2884
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top