Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!

Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!

  • Congratulations bkrike on being selected by the Tek-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

STP - Loop

Status
Not open for further replies.

mtbiker

MIS
Aug 23, 2001
126
US
I have a Server with TWO Nic's, one public one private. Both connect to the same switch, but different IP & Subnet on the NIC. Would this be considered a LOOP ?

Thanks in advance.

 
Here is a link to cisco's site for trouble shooting STP:


I just happen to be studing stp for my midterm...
I would say as long as bridging isn't set over the NICs, It shouldn't be a loop.

STP uses BPDUs(bridge protocol data units) to exchange information about switch paths not end point NICs. If you want to make sure, I'd load up a sniffer, see if you see any looping through them. A sure sign would be a serious lag and unusually high utilization of bandwidth.

Are these both NICs connected to the root bridge? If so all ports would be forwarding on that switch.

Hope that helps
 
The Cisco 2924m-xl switch doesn't seem to show that it's bombing out on bandwidth. Actually everything seems ok. Spanning Tree is turned off on the switch. I do have a port group going to another Cisco 2950 switch but my information tells me that a port group is not a loop. I recently upgraded our internet connection and have set up a proxy machine. This machine has two NIC's, one public to attach to the public IP on the router, the other NIC has a private static IP so users can connect to the proxy. Because both NIC's we're going into the same switch, just wanted to check that I wasn't creating a LOOP. My understanding is that if I was, I would know it fairly quickly because everything would slow down.

Thanks for the info, and hope you do well on your midterm.

:<}

 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top