Funny about the door-opening thing.
Of all people, our HR assistant at work has a bit of an attitude about this.
I hold the door open for anyone who's within a few paces behind me. Male, female, it doesn't matter.
Well, the HR assistant was behind me by a couple of steps, and I held the door open (as I would for anyone). She stopped, and said "You don't have to hold the door open for me." I smiled, and said "Sorry, it's habit. I hold the door for anyone behind me." "Don't do it for me," she said.
Well, I went to her supervisor (also a lady, but that's irrelevant) and asked her (without letting her know that it was her employee) how I should handle this.
Here was my argument. If I "let the door slam in her face", and refused to hold it open for her, I could be seen as being passive-agressive, because the other 125 employees *know* that I will hold the door open.
The HR manager asked if it was her assistant. (Evidently, this wasn't the first time this had come up). When I confirmed, she said "Do you want me to talk to her?" I said I didn't, because I felt that she would know that I was talking about it, and I didn't want to cause any *more* problems.
I was informed by the HR manager that what I was doing (holding the door) was perfectly appropriate, especially since I wasn't singling anyone out based on gender, etc. and that I should continue doing what I was taught and comfortable doing.
Our HR manager rocks. I told her "You know, I was biting my tongue to keep from saying 'I'm sorry, but I refuse to give you preferential treatment by not holding the door if you're behind me, since I would for any other employee. That would be favoritism.'" The HR manager and I had a laugh over that one....
Just my 2¢
"In order to start solving a problem, one must first identify its owner." --Me
--Greg