Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!

Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!

Register Log in
  • Congratulations derfloh on being selected by the Tek-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

SIP ATA

Status
Not open for further replies.
JayNEC

JayNEC

IS-IT--Management
Joined
Jun 5, 2002
Messages
942
Location
US
Anyone got a good SIP ATA that works with Session Manager? I've got a Patton M-ATA that works outbound but won't accept an inbound call. Too bad, it's pretty inexpensive. Who else besides patton out there is known to work with session manager?

New England Communications
 
Sort by date Sort by votes
I have used various, but my favourite is the audio codes range , really easy to configure and DEV connect docs exists to get you started , see below.Im sure others are similar but once you have a base config on the audio codes range you can create a .ini file that can act as a template for ease of deployment.


ACSS (UC/SBCE/SM/SME)

Not that they mean a thing anymore , get a brain dump pass the test crash the system.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Agree with Audiocodes!

Can the Patton do TCP and not UDP? At this point, I find SM's messages to endpoints thru CM to be so big that they don't fit in a 1500 MTU UDP packet anymore!
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
There's nowhere in the Micro Ata to configure that. And nowhere (that I know of) to specify in session manager that TCP be used to a particular endopint.

New England Communications
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Yeah, so if you're on release 7, SM can strip all Avaya headers on an adaptation out a SIP trunk.

If the Patton is UDP only (and you'd have to specify TCP or UDP explicitly on the ATA) and you do it as a trunk, then you can maybe work it in UDP as a trunk.

SM also has something called implicit user rules where you can map incoming SIP trunk traffic to a CM user through application sequencing like you would a SIP phone. The idea being that you could take a Norstar for example with PRI and Nortel digital phones, send CLID on that PRI to a SIP gateway to SM to CM and have calls process through CM according to station routing with COR/COS/etc. The Patton could easily do the same. I wouldn't recommend it!

It sounds like a monumental pain vs Audiocodes MP112's that can be had very cheaply.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Just as a heads up the patton are a total pain in the t*its , just stay away from them the, AC boxes are just really simple / flexible and rock solid

ACSS (UC/SBCE/SM/SME)

Not that they mean a thing anymore , get a brain dump pass the test crash the system.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
I just put some MP-11x series devices out there where a customer is using them for both inbound and 911 POTS, fax machines and one or two analog voice phones. They are working wonderfully. They were a bit to configure at first, but I've got a feeling they will be very set and forget.

My work uses them on Microsoft Lync projects pretty often and I haven't heard much negative, but a lot positive.

 
Upvote 0 Downvote
I have no love for patton at this point. Got an MP112 on the way...

New England Communications
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

hebegb41
  • Locked
  • Question Question
Converting 1 SIP carrier to another
Replies
1
Views
332
dialtonebone
dialtonebone
lexer
  • Locked
  • Question Question
Avaya phone set 4610SW SIP firmware
Replies
2
Views
444
lexer
lexer
letman2
  • Locked
  • Question Question
EZ500 with sip trunks
Replies
3
Views
644
ZeroZeroOne
ZeroZeroOne
wallot
  • Locked
  • Question Question
One way Audio - Incoming SIP call to 9408
Replies
1
Views
280
dialtonebone
dialtonebone
Alaskatelecom
  • Locked
  • Question Question
SIP J179 and Call Park - not working
Replies
3
Views
634
ZeroZeroOne
ZeroZeroOne

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top