Hello folks -
quick question - For all intents and purposes, is there any major difference between SBS2003 and server 2003 standard that would prevent an application designed for 2003 standard from installing & working properly on SBS2003.
I'm not concerned with the single domain restriction of SBS, and have dismissed that as a non-issue.
In short - if a software company were to develop a server software product for windows server 2003 - can we assume that it would be supported for use on SBS2003 systems?
Are there any significant, explicit differences between SBS2003 and 2003 Standard that I should be aware of as I evaluate softwares for my server? If tech data requirements state that server2003 is a supported platform, but SBS2003 is not mentioned, should I assume as a rule that the software won't work properly on my SBS2003 system?
In my case, I do have ISA and IIS, if it matters.
Apologies for the redundancy of my questioning, but I just want to be clear.
thx
quick question - For all intents and purposes, is there any major difference between SBS2003 and server 2003 standard that would prevent an application designed for 2003 standard from installing & working properly on SBS2003.
I'm not concerned with the single domain restriction of SBS, and have dismissed that as a non-issue.
In short - if a software company were to develop a server software product for windows server 2003 - can we assume that it would be supported for use on SBS2003 systems?
Are there any significant, explicit differences between SBS2003 and 2003 Standard that I should be aware of as I evaluate softwares for my server? If tech data requirements state that server2003 is a supported platform, but SBS2003 is not mentioned, should I assume as a rule that the software won't work properly on my SBS2003 system?
In my case, I do have ISA and IIS, if it matters.
Apologies for the redundancy of my questioning, but I just want to be clear.
thx