Either Earl and Melody already found a solution, or the problem turned out to be just visually looking as if.
The font is bigger and the lines on right margin are being lopped off
That could simply mean the notepad window isn't wide enough, not text really being lopped off.
The text file setup was used as a template by the third party and is now unrecognizable to them.
If their judgement about the file being unrecognizable, too just was made by visual inspection, then perhaps there never was a real problem.
If data needed to be at certain line/col positions and that changed, then really the content of the output text file changed somehow. So my question about the influence of embedded printer info in an FRX towards ASCII output would be the only thing that matter.
Now I simply glimpsed into the help file on REPORT FORM. the "TO Outputdestination" is explainied in detail in the last third of the help topic. [FILE] FileName2 [[ADDITIVE] ASCII] is one possible Outputdestination, and the ASCII clause is described as:
VFP help topic REPORT FORM said:
An ASCII file contains only text. If the report is a character-based layout definition created in FoxPro for MS-DOS, dashes, and plus signs may be included to represent lines and shapes. Otherwise, any font or color settings, graphics, lines, rectangles, or rounded rectangles in the report definition file do not appear in the ASCII text file. You can specify the number of characters to place on each line and the number of lines to place on each page by using the _ASCIICOLS and _ASCIIROWS system variables.
That still doesn't say if margin settings of printer info influence line width, but you have two system variables
_ASCIICOLS and
_ASCIIROWS.
The help on _ASCIICOLS says a default for it is 80, the OS does not define it, eg it's a VFP system variable, not a OS environment variable.
So if no printer page setup info embedded in the FRX would influence output to ASCII, there is no OS influence at all and it merely was the visual inspection with notepad, which was not looking the same was as on Win98. You could double check that by moving a new file to the old system and opening it there. Then there was no problem at all.
Bye, Olaf.