I have a vector which collects the four digit extension of the agent to which the caller wishes to speak and then routes the caller to that agent via a "route-to digits coverage y" step in the vector. If the agent does not answer their phone, the caller reaches the agent's voice mail. Multiple different VDNs (different toll-free numbers) use this vector.
Now I have a request that, for one VDN only, unanswered calls should not reach the agent's voice mail, but go to the next available agent instead.
How to make this happen? If I change the "with coverage" from y to n, the call will endlessly ring on the agent's phone.
I thought about changing the coverage path on the agent's station to a VDN, which would then branch off to some queue step if the VDN is the special one, otherwise it would use the "messaging skill 99 for extension ____" command. But I'm not sure how to make this work because the choices are either xxxx, active, or latest, none of which would handle correctly the agent's extension. xxxx would require a separate vector for each and every agent extension.
What would be the best way to accomplish this without bumping into the double-coverage-block issue?
Thanks,
Bill
P.S. I'm running Comm Mgr 2.2.2, but am upgrading to Comm Mgr 5.1.1 next month.
Now I have a request that, for one VDN only, unanswered calls should not reach the agent's voice mail, but go to the next available agent instead.
How to make this happen? If I change the "with coverage" from y to n, the call will endlessly ring on the agent's phone.
I thought about changing the coverage path on the agent's station to a VDN, which would then branch off to some queue step if the VDN is the special one, otherwise it would use the "messaging skill 99 for extension ____" command. But I'm not sure how to make this work because the choices are either xxxx, active, or latest, none of which would handle correctly the agent's extension. xxxx would require a separate vector for each and every agent extension.
What would be the best way to accomplish this without bumping into the double-coverage-block issue?
Thanks,
Bill
P.S. I'm running Comm Mgr 2.2.2, but am upgrading to Comm Mgr 5.1.1 next month.