RMI Question

[godcomplex]

I have a rmi server and client. Client A (an applet) sends an object to the rmi server for storage in memory (a hash table), and returns a key for later retrieval. Client B (a servlet) uses that key to obtain the object from the server, and then calls a method to remove the object from the server's hash table.

The issue is, the object that I am passing back and forth for storage, is a CORBA object (ie, extends org.omg.CORBA.portable.IDLEntity). Now this alone seemd to work out fine, but the interface was altered and now we have a CORBA holder class wrapping the original, and I always get an UnMarahalling Exception. I am still sending the actual object, not the holder class.

From my experience in the past I know that I always had to implement Serializable, but in this case I figured a CORBA object would do the trick. Any thoughts on this?

-gc "I don't look busy because I did it right the first time."

 

[godcomplex]

Diregard the question. I found that it helps to bounce the web server when making changes to the api.

DOH!

-gc "I don't look busy because I did it right the first time."