i want to replace this server with a two server netware 6 cluster
netware 6 sp3 server with edir 8.7. server hosts the slpda and CA.
the DA is distributed to most sites via dhcp but there are a large amount that are statically configured (either through misconfiguration , politics or whatever).
the name of the server apears in lots of scripts and due to a citrix app - there are a number of machines that this name is incorporated into a hard mapping )this is easily
modified in a find and replace registry exercise on the citrix servers.
concerns
for all drive mappings to be ok - the physical server name would have to become a virtual name. (scared this may cause future issues as if you get any probs how to you know
if it's a link to the old ncp server or the new virtual)
if the drive mapping name is changed some pc's may have issues where word etc likes to keep unc paths
would prefer to keep the slpda ip address the same, was going to make this a clustered resource but this would mean the address of original server/replacement server would need to change
any thoughts
in changing the server with CA - is it only changing ip address that causes hassle or does the name cause same concerns
is it better to keep the CA off the cluster and bit the bullet and move it to a totally new serevr
netware 6 sp3 server with edir 8.7. server hosts the slpda and CA.
the DA is distributed to most sites via dhcp but there are a large amount that are statically configured (either through misconfiguration , politics or whatever).
the name of the server apears in lots of scripts and due to a citrix app - there are a number of machines that this name is incorporated into a hard mapping )this is easily
modified in a find and replace registry exercise on the citrix servers.
concerns
for all drive mappings to be ok - the physical server name would have to become a virtual name. (scared this may cause future issues as if you get any probs how to you know
if it's a link to the old ncp server or the new virtual)
if the drive mapping name is changed some pc's may have issues where word etc likes to keep unc paths
would prefer to keep the slpda ip address the same, was going to make this a clustered resource but this would mean the address of original server/replacement server would need to change
any thoughts
in changing the server with CA - is it only changing ip address that causes hassle or does the name cause same concerns
is it better to keep the CA off the cluster and bit the bullet and move it to a totally new serevr