For what it's worth:
The Character Text Path Direction sequence (<Esc>&c#T) is described in the PCL5 Comparison Guide manual.
The sequence "allows the user to vertically rotate text for use in vertical writing applications".
A # value of 1 (as per the original post) is not defined; the two allowed values are:
0
the printer’s current active position (CAP) advances left to right, and linefeed advances top to bottom with horizontal, upright characters.
-1
the following actions occur:
[ul]
[li]Full-width characters in large fonts are rotated counter-clockwise 90 degrees (“vertical rotated” characters).[/li]
[li]Vertical substitutes are made for characters which change their appearance, orientation, or positioning when written vertically.[/li]
[li]All other characters are unaffected by this setting.[/li]
[/ul]
It is unclear exactly what is meant by 'full-width characters in large fonts'.
The manual indicates that large fonts "such as the MS Mincho and MS Gothic fonts supplied in the [LaserJet 4PJ] printer, are fonts which are bound to large symbol sets".
It also states that:
"In the MS-Mincho and MS-Gothic fonts provided in the HP LaserJet 4PJ, font metric calculation is somewhat easier than for the Latin-based fonts. Width calculations are easier because all characters of these fonts conform to one of two different character widths at a particular point size. The characters are either considered full-width or half- width. One-byte characters are always half-width and two-byte characters are always full-width".
It is unclear whether this implies that vertical rotated characters are retricted to characters which have two-byte character codes (in the Windows 3.1 Japan symbol set 19K presumably) in just these two fonts.
This is unlikely, but it doesn't really explain what may happen with other symbol sets (which may include characters which (in the chosen symbol set) use two byte character codes) and fonts (which may have characters of various different character widths, not just two widths).
All that I can conclude at present is that the feature will probably only work with (certain) Japanese (or other Eastern language) fonts and symbol sets; it won't work with standard fonts & symbol sets, or with ASCII characters.