Is it common to see a 150ms delay accross a Pix 506E?
I have an external subnet (Public IP) then the Pix and then an internal subnet (Private IP). I am using NAT overload for some of the internal hosts and static NAT for a couple internal servers. When I ping my web server in the external subnet from the internet I see an average delay of 46ms. When I ping a statically mapped(NAT) address on the internal LAN I see an average delay of 196ms. Below are some of the performance outputs from the Pix.
Wall# show cpu usage
CPU utilization for 5 seconds = 0%; 1 minute: 0%; 5 minutes: 0%
Wall# show perfmon
PERFMON STATS: Current Average
Xlates 1/s 0/s
Connections 1/s 0/s
TCP Conns 1/s 0/s
UDP Conns 0/s 0/s
URL Access 1/s 0/s
WebSns Req 0/s 0/s
TCP Fixup 23/s 0/s
TCPIntercept 0/s 0/s
HTTP Fixup 22/s 0/s
FTP Fixup 0/s 0/s
AAA Authen 0/s 0/s
AAA Author 0/s 0/s
AAA Account 0/s 0/s
wall# show mem
33554432 bytes total, 18264064 bytes free
The Pix does not seem to be overwhelmed. Is there a configuration issue that is causing this or is it just the nature of NAT/Firewall.
Thanks,
Keith
I have an external subnet (Public IP) then the Pix and then an internal subnet (Private IP). I am using NAT overload for some of the internal hosts and static NAT for a couple internal servers. When I ping my web server in the external subnet from the internet I see an average delay of 46ms. When I ping a statically mapped(NAT) address on the internal LAN I see an average delay of 196ms. Below are some of the performance outputs from the Pix.
Wall# show cpu usage
CPU utilization for 5 seconds = 0%; 1 minute: 0%; 5 minutes: 0%
Wall# show perfmon
PERFMON STATS: Current Average
Xlates 1/s 0/s
Connections 1/s 0/s
TCP Conns 1/s 0/s
UDP Conns 0/s 0/s
URL Access 1/s 0/s
WebSns Req 0/s 0/s
TCP Fixup 23/s 0/s
TCPIntercept 0/s 0/s
HTTP Fixup 22/s 0/s
FTP Fixup 0/s 0/s
AAA Authen 0/s 0/s
AAA Author 0/s 0/s
AAA Account 0/s 0/s
wall# show mem
33554432 bytes total, 18264064 bytes free
The Pix does not seem to be overwhelmed. Is there a configuration issue that is causing this or is it just the nature of NAT/Firewall.
Thanks,
Keith