Faxof,
I believe your hesitance to use the term "bribe" may stem from its virtually universal negative connotation. You simply gave a "gift" to your sister department a) hoping that they would treat you "nicely" in the future and b) without their cognizance of your motives. That certainly seems innocuous, not resembling the typical "downtown, smoke-filled back room"-style bribe.
Nevertheless, compare your "gift" scenario with a revisit to Webster's clear, concise definition:
(Webster's) said:
bribe1 : money or favor given or promised in order to influence the judgment or conduct of a person in a position of trust
2 : something that serves to induce or influence
Note that to qualify as a "bribe", there is no mention that the recipient must acknowledge the intent or motive of the "gift". So, apply the test:
1) Did you make the gift "to influence the judgment or conduct of a person in a position of trust [or in a position to render you service]?" and/or
2) Did you give the gift "to induce or influence"?
From your description of the scenario, my sense is that the answer is "yes" on both counts [no legal pun intended]. But, to the issue of whether your scenario breaks legal, ethical, or company-policy guidelines: I doubt there is a legal problem; I don't see an ethical problem; and I doubt your company's employee handbook proscribes the behaviour either.
In the final analysis, I believe it comes down to are you losing sleep over the issue. If so, then you must decide how to deal with it.
I live by the axiom, "If you have to ask yourself, 'Is it wrong?', then it probably is (for you)." [...And in all honestly, there have been multiple times in my life when I have consciously chosen the "wrong" thing.]
![[santa] [santa] [santa]](/data/assets/smilies/santa.gif)
Mufasa
(aka Dave of Sandy, Utah, USA)
Do you use
Oracle and live or work in
Utah, USA?
Then click here to join
Utah Oracle Users Group on Tek-Tips.