Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!

Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!

  • Congratulations bkrike on being selected by the Tek-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

norton systemworks/question 1

Status
Not open for further replies.

occas

Technical User
Jan 14, 2004
164
US
i made a post, my first one, about my system being slow on startup. takes 4 or 5 minutes to load. i ran a chkdsk as advised. i never did try the recovery console/fixboot option. not lazy, just a little intimidated.

i have norton systemworks 2002 on my machine and it is due for renewal. while browsing for a place to purchase the 2003 or later version. i came across some interesting posts. several posts concerned norton systemworks causing machines to be slow starting.

my machine had no problem until one day i was downloading a page from microsoft.com. it froze all of my windows and i had really no choice(i knew of) but to go to start>shutdown. i had a problem with it doing that and a message from norton saying something about any data not saved would be lost. since then, when i shut down, i always get that same display. it didn't do it before.

makes me wonder if norton is the culprit. i figure i can purchase the new norton systemworks and uninstall the old one. after uninstalling, i can start up with no norton on the machine and maybe see if that is the culprit.

but i am curious as to whether i should just buy the virus protector and not worry about those extra utilities. any comments, tyvm.
 
I prefer Go-Back to System restore because of all the downloading and experimenting I do. System restore does just that - restores "system" properties. Go-Back restores the whole computer to a previous operating state.
 
micker377,

I keep GoBack now on one of my machines for exactly the reason you state: I do a lot of experimentation, and need to revert the machine completely to a known state. But you would be surprised, as I was, how big a performance hit in normal startup and desktop tasks this feature requires.

GoBack offers superior features to the native System Restore and driver rollback features of XPk. At a tremendous performance hit.

Take it off temporarily and see how much fast your machine will be in normal desktop use: startup, context menus, everything. I decideded that the native tools were good enough for me, but you have to compare the before and after to appreciate my argument.

 
I do not use goback for the reasons stated by Bcastner. To restore my system to a previous state, I always make a complete backup with Ghost to another drive Array before I do any experimentation. If I find any problems I either boot from the other array or restore everything with Ghost. This works very well indeed and so far I had no problems. Incidently I timed my boot up time. From a cold start untill I can use Netscape it is exacty 20.04 seconds. So even with my HT EE 3.2 processor and Raid 0 arrays the gain agains Bcastner 22 second is negligable. Excuse my writing but the local time is 3.30 AM. Regards

Jurgen
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top