cyclegeek said:
When CI Host had a meltdown for two odd weeks I cancelled my accounts with them. The nasty surprise came when I contacted Registrar.com to change my DNS entries - and couldn't. Not only couldn't I change my DNS entries, Registrar.com wouldn't even do it for me because the domains were on CI Host's master account. They said I owned them, but had to get authorization from CI Host to release my domains into my control. Imagine that. And just to reiterate(probably pointlessly), the domains belonged to me. A WhoIs lookup showed myself as the owner.
CI Host are well known in the industry for the lawsuits that they brought on many people and while there are many dodgy companies, that does not mean that every company is the same as this.
cyclegeek said:
That wasn't the worst part. CI Host pointelessly REFUSED to cooperate. For days. It took a lot of time and effort to motivate them in the proper direction. Registrar.com assured me that once they heard from CI Host, my DNS entries could be changed in minutes, by me.
No matter whether you had gone directly with a registrar or not, this situation could arise. Any company could go under and any company could decide that they want to screw their customers. As you are the registrant, you legally have control over that domain and when pushed, the registrar
must release the domain into your control.
Just because you go directly to a registrar does not mean that you have total control over the domain without their approval. Some registrars allow you to control your domain from a control panel but require e-mail to switch nameservers or release the domain from their control. The point here is that any company can make life difficult for their customers if that is their intention.
cyclegeek said:
So the lesson is, look out for yourself, and you won't have to convince negative slackers that your advice isn't pointless.
I offer domain registration through my company. (Although it is only provided to expand our services, it is mainly aimed at hosting customers) I think I am well within my rights to question someone who comments that people should never use my services. (You never said that directly, but I was bundled with the companies never to use)
If you have a business, would you agree with someone posting that people should never use your services and not providing one piece of reasoning?
Let's try to stay with Adult comments, what is name calling going to solve? If you had read my post, you would have noticed I said the following:
Advising against using a third party solution without providing any evidence to support your cause is pointless.
I never said saying this was pointless, I said it was a pointless statement when you provided no evidence in your post to backup your claim.
Wullie
The pessimist complains about the wind. The optimist expects it to change. The leader adjusts the sails. - John Maxwell