MPLS 1

[IPKONFIG]

Anyone have any connections into an MPLS network that is running VoIP that has to have traffic shaping on their WAN links?

"I can picture a world without war. A world without hate. A world without fear. And I can picture us attacking that world, because they'd never expect it."
- Jack Handey, Deep Thoughts

 

[Andyleates]

Yes

Andy Leates MCSE CCNA MCP+I

 

[IPKONFIG]

Andy,

I am using putting all my traffic shaping and QoS together and was wondering if you ran into any issues with large WAN links over-running smaller WAN links. My issue is between my OC-3 and my T-1 connected branches. I've got a config worked out I was just wondering if I could scrub it against someones config that was being used in production. I'm interested in just the policy-map and the class-map statements. Do you mind?

"I can picture a world without war. A world without hate. A world without fear. And I can picture us attacking that world, because they'd never expect it."
- Jack Handey, Deep Thoughts

 

[Andyleates]

We only have a very small 256K connection over the MPLS with 4 voip channels, but here are the bits you asked for.

class-map match-all voip
match access-group 100
class-map match-all eigrp
match access-group 101
class-map match-all bgp
match access-group 102
!
!
policy-map voip
class voip
priority 128
set ip precedence 5
class bgp
bandwidth 8
class class-default
set ip precedence 3
policy-map LLQ
class voip
priority 1400
class eigrp
bandwidth 8

map-class frame-relay fr-shaping
no frame-relay adaptive-shaping
frame-relay cir 256000
frame-relay bc 2560
frame-relay mincir 256000
service-policy output voip

If I have missed anything out the let me know.

Andy

Andy Leates MCSE CCNA MCP+I

 

[IPKONFIG]

Andy, thanks for posting that information. Looks like we have similar commands, but my issue is that I have an OC-3 that has to feed about 80 T-1 sites right now. Here is what I have so far (work in progress. I'm just wondering if it will work as I expect it too. (Really need that OC-3 in the lab)

Ip cef distributed
!
Class-map VoIP-Signaling
Description VoIP Signaling Traffic
Match dscp cs3 af31
Class-map VoIP-RTP
Description VoIP Bearer Traffic
Match dscp ef
Class-map R-WICHMAIN
Match access-group name R-WICHMAIN
Class-map R-COLUMBUSMAIN
Match access-group name R-COLUMBUSMAIN
Class-map R-ELDORADO
Match access-group name R-ELDORADO


Policy-map T1-Voice
Class VoIP-RTP
Priority 768
Class VoIP-Signaling
Bandwidth 56
Class class-default
Fair-queue
Random-detect
Policy-map 40M-Voice
Class VoIP-RTP
Priority 6400
Class VoIP-Signaling
Bandwidth 200
Class class-default
Fair-queue
Random-detect


!
Policy-map MPLS-QoS-Shape
Class R-ELDORADO
Shape average 1390000
Service-policy T1-Voice
Class R-COLUMBUSMAIN
Shape average 1390000
Service-policy T1-Voice
Class R-WICHMAIN
Shape average 36000000 <--not sure about this figure yet.
Service-policy 40M-Voice



Ip access-list name R-WICHMAIN permit ip any 10.X.X.X 0.0.0.255
IP access-list name R-ELDORADO permit ip any 10.X.X.X 0.0.0.255
Ip access-list name R-COLUMBUSMAIN permit ip any 10.X.X.X 0.0.0.255

Interface ATM8/0/0
pvc 1/80
vbr-nrt 149760 149760
max-reserved-bandwidth 99
service-policy output MPLS-QoS-Shape


&quot;I can picture a world without war. A world without hate. A world without fear. And I can picture us attacking that world, because they'd never expect it.&quot;
- Jack Handey, Deep Thoughts

 

[Andyleates]

Heh, it is at this point I start to wish I had never aswered your original question and hide under a rock until someone with more letters after their name comes along!

Andy Leates MCSE CCNA MCP+I

 

[IPKONFIG]

Andy,

Don't worry about it. I just wanted some real comparisons to look at is all. Examples on Cisco's website are not the best to go after. I appreciate your posting. Earned you a star. Thanks again.

Carl

&quot;I can picture a world without war. A world without hate. A world without fear. And I can picture us attacking that world, because they'd never expect it.&quot;
- Jack Handey, Deep Thoughts