Hi all
I've set up SQL 2005 on my machine and am administering my companies sql 2000 databases with it. I just want confirmation that i wont screw anything up this way - i know the data is the same, but there are a few differences that i worry may mess things up. For example, i know sql maintenance plans in 2005 only allow one schedule for the whole maint plan, whereas in 2000 you could have multiple schedules for different tasks within the same plan. I just wonder if playing around with 2000 databases in the 2005 mgmt studio (with it's new functionality AND restrictions) might mess something up.
Any tips??
Div
P.S. I HATE maintenance tasks in SQL 2005!!! It's like building a web form in visual studio!!!
I've set up SQL 2005 on my machine and am administering my companies sql 2000 databases with it. I just want confirmation that i wont screw anything up this way - i know the data is the same, but there are a few differences that i worry may mess things up. For example, i know sql maintenance plans in 2005 only allow one schedule for the whole maint plan, whereas in 2000 you could have multiple schedules for different tasks within the same plan. I just wonder if playing around with 2000 databases in the 2005 mgmt studio (with it's new functionality AND restrictions) might mess something up.
Any tips??
Div
P.S. I HATE maintenance tasks in SQL 2005!!! It's like building a web form in visual studio!!!