LD barring when NOT using 9N

[Greybeard191]

I'm suffering a moment of cognetitive dissonance...

I've multiple times done LD barring using ARS and a user 9N short code that points to a toll restricted ARS.

Problem is that this customer doesn't want to use 9 for outside dialing. Their dial plan supports it (no 9), nothing really conflicts, and it works OK. But they also want about half the phone to be LD restricted. A 9N user short code isn't going to work.

Any ideas on how to achieve this in an eniroment where you're not dialing 9 for an outside line?

thanks.

 

[kholladay]

This is how I do it.

http://www.ipofficehelp.com/HOWTO_BypassDial9.html

Kyle Holladay
ACSS & APSS SME Communications
MCP/MCTS Exchange 2007
Adtran ATSA, Aruba ACMA

"I have one speed, I have one gear...GO!!!" - Charlie Sheen

"Thinking is the hardest work there is, which is the probable reason why so few engage in it." - Henry Ford

 

[amriddle01]

Do all LD calls start the same/similar to each other?

ACSS (SME)
APSS (SME)

http://www.ipoffice.tel

"I'm just off to Hartlepool to buy some exploding trousers

 

[Greybeard191]

in NA, so they all start with 1...

I could build a user 1N and point it at an ARS with everything barred?

GB

 

[amriddle01]

Exactly, or the other way around bar 1N in system and allow in user, depends if more can dial or more are banned

ACSS (SME)
APSS (SME)

http://www.ipoffice.tel

"I'm just off to Hartlepool to buy some exploding trousers

 

[IPGuru]

Alwasy much nicer to bar everything in system & allow in user short codes even if there are more allowed than not, it makes sure that any newuser added is restricted untill allowed.

using user rights reduces the amount of retyping anyway.


I do not Have A.D.D. im just easily, Hey look a Squirrel!