Hi everyone.
I work at a non-profit of about 20 people, with four or five part-time/remote employees. In the office, everyone is using MS applications on Windows 2000 PCs. Our fileserver runs Samba on a Debian box. Basically peer-to-peer with all Samba users treated as "guests".
As a non-profit buyer, I was recently able to buy a copy of Windows Small Business Server 2003 for...well...REALLY cheap (including all extra licenses).
I've been reading posts everywhere and I just can't decide if moving to an all Windows network is the way to go. A couple of the things that we definitely want:
- VPN access
- Greater control over virus/spam filtering at the server level (currently using POP3 mail)
- Shared Outlook calendars
- Tighter control of user permissions on local file system
SBS2003 seems to make deployment of most of this pretty easy (with the exception of solid virus/spam filtering).
We have limited IT support (basically, just me, and I have plenty of stuff to do all the time and I'm not Linux savvy). I'd REALLY like to hear what everyone thinks of the idea of going with an all Linux network in a smallish organization with limited IT support but a craving for solid technology. Given that I paid almost nothing for SBS2003, initial cost of the software is not really an issue.
My concerns with Windows are:
- getting trapped into using MS products
- relentless claims that Windows servers are not as secure as Linux
My concerns with Linux:
- it's going to be really hard to implement
- "extras" like VPN and a substitue for Exchange which will allow for Calendar sharing are going to be so damn confusing to implement
Any feedback is GREATLY appreciated. Would love to hear stories from similar organizations.
I work at a non-profit of about 20 people, with four or five part-time/remote employees. In the office, everyone is using MS applications on Windows 2000 PCs. Our fileserver runs Samba on a Debian box. Basically peer-to-peer with all Samba users treated as "guests".
As a non-profit buyer, I was recently able to buy a copy of Windows Small Business Server 2003 for...well...REALLY cheap (including all extra licenses).
I've been reading posts everywhere and I just can't decide if moving to an all Windows network is the way to go. A couple of the things that we definitely want:
- VPN access
- Greater control over virus/spam filtering at the server level (currently using POP3 mail)
- Shared Outlook calendars
- Tighter control of user permissions on local file system
SBS2003 seems to make deployment of most of this pretty easy (with the exception of solid virus/spam filtering).
We have limited IT support (basically, just me, and I have plenty of stuff to do all the time and I'm not Linux savvy). I'd REALLY like to hear what everyone thinks of the idea of going with an all Linux network in a smallish organization with limited IT support but a craving for solid technology. Given that I paid almost nothing for SBS2003, initial cost of the software is not really an issue.
My concerns with Windows are:
- getting trapped into using MS products
- relentless claims that Windows servers are not as secure as Linux
My concerns with Linux:
- it's going to be really hard to implement
- "extras" like VPN and a substitue for Exchange which will allow for Calendar sharing are going to be so damn confusing to implement
Any feedback is GREATLY appreciated. Would love to hear stories from similar organizations.