Hmmm,
That netmask is invalid. They may have meant 255.255.255.240 but that would mean the IP address 92.116.60.15 is invalid too as for that mask, it would be a network address and not a host address. Why? Simplifying it, a range of hosts determined by a subnet can also be referenced by a network address (which identifies the subnet alone, and the broadcast which can be used to identify all hosts at one time).
To use the standard 255.255.255.0 as an example - this determines 254 possible machines on a subnet. So for a network of 192.168.1.0, the hosts are 192.168.1.1 to 192.168.1.254 and the broadcast address is 192.168.1.255
With 255.255.255.224 - this determines 30 hosts in the subnet. As one IP address is 192.116.60.15, it can be calculated that the network address is:
192.116.60.0
The hosts on the subnet are:
192.116.60.1 to 192.116.60.30
and the broadcast is:
192.116.60.31
And as an example, the 'next' subnet would be:
192.116.60.32 (net)
192.116.60.33 to 62 (hosts)
192.168.60.63 (broadcast)
This is a good online calculator:
Maybe they meant 255.255.255.224