Hello,<br>
<br>
I currently have three locations in my setup, A (remote location) C (Remote Location), and B (Main Location both PVC's from A and C term here). I was wondering what is the best way to set up this situation. Currently Location A can talk to B and C can talk to B but A cannot talk to C. Both A and C are coming into a cisco 3102 sharing the same interface and DLCI and PVC address. Should I create 2 subinterfaces point to point and get another DLCI from ATT? Also split the PVC's into different addressing schemes? The guy at ATT claims that is not the way to do it and will not give me a DLCI, but he did not offer any explanation. Any help would be appreciated.<br>
<br>
Thanks <br>
<br>
Jason
<br>
I currently have three locations in my setup, A (remote location) C (Remote Location), and B (Main Location both PVC's from A and C term here). I was wondering what is the best way to set up this situation. Currently Location A can talk to B and C can talk to B but A cannot talk to C. Both A and C are coming into a cisco 3102 sharing the same interface and DLCI and PVC address. Should I create 2 subinterfaces point to point and get another DLCI from ATT? Also split the PVC's into different addressing schemes? The guy at ATT claims that is not the way to do it and will not give me a DLCI, but he did not offer any explanation. Any help would be appreciated.<br>
<br>
Thanks <br>
<br>
Jason