I'm expanding the existing topology in my company. I have a central Catalyst 4510 with many VLAN.
I'm trying to connect a 2900XL with ethernet link, so I've set the vtp mode in transparent (4510 is in server mode). I've defined three VLAN: 2 (Support) and 3 (Intranet), the same ID as in 4510.
In 2900 I've configured f 0/1 like a trunk port. I haven't disallowed any vlan by now throgh trunking. I connect 2900 and 4510 (g 4/47 as a trunk port), there's layer 1 and layer 2 (interface is up, line protocol is up).
Suddenly, some stations from vlan 2 losses connection, only a a few of them. The rest of members (whose ports belongs to the same vlan 2) can work as always.
_____4510___________________________........ 2900
/ \ |
sw1 sw2 sw3
/ | \ / | \ / | \
s1 s2 s3 s4 s5 s6 s7 s8 s9
For example, s1, s2, s4 and s5 belongs vlan2. If I connect 2900, s1 and s2 losses connection: (ping won't work).
There's no spanning-tree enabled, nevertheless sw3 has only stations that belongs to vlan3 (it connects to 4510 throgh fiber link) and the configuration would be the same. I've looking at the configuration and there's a unique difference ("no spanning-tree vlan 2, 3, etc).
I'm putting the blame on sw1 (different provider: 3com) the rest of them are Cisco too.
Maybe convergence time? I thought this operation would be fast.
Is there a special configuration if you have some trunk ports in a switch?
I'm trying to connect a 2900XL with ethernet link, so I've set the vtp mode in transparent (4510 is in server mode). I've defined three VLAN: 2 (Support) and 3 (Intranet), the same ID as in 4510.
In 2900 I've configured f 0/1 like a trunk port. I haven't disallowed any vlan by now throgh trunking. I connect 2900 and 4510 (g 4/47 as a trunk port), there's layer 1 and layer 2 (interface is up, line protocol is up).
Suddenly, some stations from vlan 2 losses connection, only a a few of them. The rest of members (whose ports belongs to the same vlan 2) can work as always.
_____4510___________________________........ 2900
/ \ |
sw1 sw2 sw3
/ | \ / | \ / | \
s1 s2 s3 s4 s5 s6 s7 s8 s9
For example, s1, s2, s4 and s5 belongs vlan2. If I connect 2900, s1 and s2 losses connection: (ping won't work).
There's no spanning-tree enabled, nevertheless sw3 has only stations that belongs to vlan3 (it connects to 4510 throgh fiber link) and the configuration would be the same. I've looking at the configuration and there's a unique difference ("no spanning-tree vlan 2, 3, etc).
I'm putting the blame on sw1 (different provider: 3com) the rest of them are Cisco too.
Maybe convergence time? I thought this operation would be fast.
Is there a special configuration if you have some trunk ports in a switch?