umbletech
IS-IT--Management
- Jan 29, 2006
- 196
Hi All
Just confirming my understanding. We have an AAP 3 node exchange 2003 cluster. We have two virtual servers that shouldn't try to run on one node.
In hklm\cluster\groups there were 3 guid instances:
5fd43bd1-4b60-4c47-b6ef-2cb8b587b475
This one had no AntiAffinityClassName set.
67dd35e9-a2f4-46fc-a6c8-5ad3c5e25426
e7b47872-3358-4b9b-a804-3958ec5a0ce8
These two had an AntiAffinityClassName of 'Microsoft
Exchange Virtual Server' set.
Now what I assume is that the last two GUIDs are those of the 2 active nodes and the Cluster service writes these values dynamically as the virtual servers move from node to node.
Is this how it works?
What I am unclear about is the priority. This page gives some guidelines - where does antiaffinity fit in these guidelines?
Just confirming my understanding. We have an AAP 3 node exchange 2003 cluster. We have two virtual servers that shouldn't try to run on one node.
In hklm\cluster\groups there were 3 guid instances:
5fd43bd1-4b60-4c47-b6ef-2cb8b587b475
This one had no AntiAffinityClassName set.
67dd35e9-a2f4-46fc-a6c8-5ad3c5e25426
e7b47872-3358-4b9b-a804-3958ec5a0ce8
These two had an AntiAffinityClassName of 'Microsoft
Exchange Virtual Server' set.
Now what I assume is that the last two GUIDs are those of the 2 active nodes and the Cluster service writes these values dynamically as the virtual servers move from node to node.
Is this how it works?
What I am unclear about is the priority. This page gives some guidelines - where does antiaffinity fit in these guidelines?