Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!

Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!

  • Congratulations bkrike on being selected by the Tek-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Event Id 5719 on W2K Member Servers

Status
Not open for further replies.

Knutern

Technical User
Mar 5, 2002
285
NO
I have been searching around for a while on this issue, and have come accross a lot of information. Still my problem persists. There are three servers, one is DC and DNS and the others are member servers.

1. Reading the event log, the following error message is being displayed: (NETLOGON Event Id 5719) - No Windows NT or Windows 2000 Domain Controller is available for domain XXX. The following error occurred: There are currently no logon servers available to service the logon request.

2. Performing NETDIAG gives me the following results:
DC discovery test. . . . . . . . . : Passed
DC list test . . . . . . . . . . . : Passed
Trust relationship test. . . . . . : Passed
Secure channel for domain 'XXX' is to '\\srvr.xxx.xxx'.
Kerberos test. . . . . . . . . . . : Passed
LDAP test. . . . . . . . . . . . . : Passed

Some additional information: Windows 2000 Service Pack 4 is installed, my switch has portfast enabled. I am able to log onto the member servers. Even if i was not logged onto them once before, which implies it must find a DC somehow.

At the beginning, before i set our swicht to portfast, we also had this error message: The Windows Time Service was not able to find a Domain Controller. A time and date update was not possible.

I also set the NETLOGON service to start after DNS Client has started with no improvement.

The following articles have been at hand to aid me in my troubleshooting process (and numerous threads @tek-tips.com):
1. How to Force Kerberos to Use TCP Instead of UDP: 2. Netlogon Logs Event ID 5719 on a Domain Controller: 3. Server Logs Netlogon Event 5719 When Starting: 4. Setting up the Domain Name System for Active Directory:
Re 1) Kerberos is not an issue since NETDIAG does not have a problem when testing.

Re 2) Since it's no DC it should be of no concern, but I tested it never the less, without improvement however.

Re 3) Our Switch (Cisco Catalyst 4003), and the switchports in question, are set to handle Portfast. After changing to portfast w32time errors do not occur any more.

Re 4) Well, DNS is from what I can tell ok.

Any hints out there regarding this issue are deeply appreciated.

Cheers
 
quoted from Event ID 5719 - The system cannot log you on now because the domain "name" is not available."
Symptoms: when attempting to logon a domain, you keep getting an error that &quot;The system cannot log you on now because the domain &quot;name&quot; is not available.&quot; Also, Event viewer shows Event ID: 5719. No Windows NT or Windows 2000 Domain Controller is available for domain <domain name>. The following error occurred: There are currently no logon servers available to service the logon request.

Resolutions: One possible cause of this error is that you have run out of buffer space in the NetBT datagram buffer. To resolve this problem, increase the MaxDgramBuffering value from 128 KB to 256 KB. Run Regedt32.exe, go to HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\NetBT\Parameters. On the Edit menu, click Add Value, and then add the following information:

Value Name: MaxDgramBuffering
Data Type: REG_DWORD
Value: 0x40000

For more tips or information, go to
Robert, MS-MVP/MCSE and CNE
Windows & Network Support, Tips and FAQs on

Robert Lin, MS-MVP, MCSE & CNE
Windows, Network and How to at
 
Hmmm...

I wrote such a long message, even listing the things that I had checked.

Your (blin2000) advice was one of the things i'd already done. 2. Netlogon Logs Event ID 5719 on a Domain Controller:
Again: It's NOT a DC that has this problem and i have already tested it with MaxDgramBuffering set to 0x40000

Cheers
 
Hi Guys,

Out of interest, has this issue been resolved? I have been having a hell of a time trying to work out the exact same thing.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top