The world is dominated by formal, bureaucratic methodologies. These usually are 'waterfall' - define a solution and then proceed to build it in an ordered fashion. Preferably, delegate in as many presciptive formats to as many sub-teams, most of whom don't have a clue about what the business need is, or even what the business is. Then have a load of testers and other innocents who are just floating in never-never land. Eventually your project will work (sort of) but in the meantime you will have blown away enough cash to save half the population of some drought-ridden African region. Sadly however, they die.
Alternatively, think in terms of dynamic (if unfashionable) alternatives like RAD, Timeboxing, Extreme Project Management etc etc. At least you'll feel there are few mortals out there that are sentient beings like you.
It's a distorted in which we live, but it's helpful if you can sit in that meeting thinking "I know you all think I'm daft, but actually it's you that are deluding yourselves..."