Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!

Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!

  • Congratulations Chriss Miller on being selected by the Tek-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Design question

Status
Not open for further replies.

paultaylor04

Technical User
Joined
Oct 16, 2003
Messages
46
Location
US
Here is the infrastructure I have to work with:

INTERNET-----3600 router----PIX

I have to do the overload NATTING on the PIX. I am planning on doing this.
Can you tell me if it looks fine?

205.171.3.65 is borrowed from their pool of public IP addresses.
Create a static statement on the 1601 router, static of 205.171.3.65 to
10.1.1.65.

Make the network between the PIX and the router: 10.3.3.4/30

So, PIX e0=10.3.3.5 and Router ethernet=10.3.3.6

For NAT on the PIX, I would do this:
nat (inside) 1 10.1.1.0 255.255.255.0
global (outside) 1 10.1.1.65 netmask 255.255.255.0

10.1.1.0 is of course their internal network.


1)Now, is there a better way to do this? I have to abide by certain things
such as NAT has to be done on the PIX.

2)Is there any way to do this if they don't have any public address
available excepting the one which is configured at the router's serial
interface connecting to the CSU/DSU? It's a T1
 
paul,
If you plan to have a private network (10.3.3.x) between the PIX and perimeter router, then the NAT overload statement would best be applied on the perimeter router.

Router
interface serial[X]
ip address <public address>
..
ip nat outside

interface e0
ip address 10.3.3.6 255.255.255.252
ip nat inside

ip nat inside source list 1 interface serial[X] overload
access-list 1 permit <your internal network>

PIX
nat (inside) 1 <your internal network> 255.255.255.0 0 0
global (outside) 1 10.3.3.5

JimmyZ

 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top