Hello all.
We currently have a point to point clear channel T3 between two of our sites (A & B) terminated on 3745s. This is primarily utilized for a remote copy application to keep our mainframe storage sync'ed, which uses IP and a proprietary layer 4 protocol.
At this time, the synchronization is one way, so we have heavy utilization on the T3 going in one direction (A -> B), and extremely light utilization going the other way (B -> A).
There is talk of wanting to do synchronization both ways and my management thinks we will need another T3 to do this, but I think that we can use the same T3 since the B -> A utilization on the T3 is so low. The circuit should be able to handle 45MB/s in both directions simultaneously not an aggregate, shouldn't it?
The modules are NM-1T3/E3's.
Thanks.
We currently have a point to point clear channel T3 between two of our sites (A & B) terminated on 3745s. This is primarily utilized for a remote copy application to keep our mainframe storage sync'ed, which uses IP and a proprietary layer 4 protocol.
At this time, the synchronization is one way, so we have heavy utilization on the T3 going in one direction (A -> B), and extremely light utilization going the other way (B -> A).
There is talk of wanting to do synchronization both ways and my management thinks we will need another T3 to do this, but I think that we can use the same T3 since the B -> A utilization on the T3 is so low. The circuit should be able to handle 45MB/s in both directions simultaneously not an aggregate, shouldn't it?
The modules are NM-1T3/E3's.
Thanks.