Cisco 2612 Point to point-- can't get traffic/in out 4

[ITlackey]

With apologies for what is most likely a simple solution.

I have set up a t1 point to point connection to be used to link two plants together, bridging 2 subnets (192.168.0.0 & 192.168.1.0). I have configured the routes to run statically routed and filtered using a route map set up, and a access list configured. I can ping all four interfaces from either machine (both ethernet interfaces on either end and both serial interfaces), but cannot get traffic outside the router (e.g. 192.168.1.253 is unreachable). I am just not seeing what else needs to be done.

Any suggestions of how to fix this/do this better would be most helpful. See configuration below (less passwords):

Current configuration:
!
version 12.0
service config
service timestamps debug uptime
service timestamps log uptime
no service password-encryption
!
hostname plant2
!
!
!
!
!
!
ip subnet-zero
!
cns event-service server
!
!
--More--  !
process-max-time 200
!
interface Ethernet0/0
description ethernet interface plant 2
ip address 192.168.1.254 255.255.255.0
no ip directed-broadcast
ip route-cache policy
ip policy route-map toplant1
no cdp enable
no mop enabled
!
interface Serial0/0
description pt-pt t1
ip address 172.16.216.3 255.255.255.0
no ip directed-broadcast
no ip mroute-cache
service-module t1 clock source internal
!
interface TokenRing0/0
no ip address
no ip directed-broadcast
shutdown
--More--   ring-speed 16
no cdp enable
!
router rip
redistribute connected
network 172.16.0.0
network 192.168.1.0
distribute-list 12 out Ethernet0/0
distribute-list 12 in Ethernet0/0
distribute-list 12 out Serial0/0
distribute-list 12 in Serial0/0
!
ip classless
ip route 172.16.216.0 255.255.255.0 Ethernet0/0
ip route 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0 172.16.216.2
ip route 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 Ethernet0/0
no ip http server
!
access-list 1 permit 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 2 permit 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 10 permit 192.168.1.0
access-list 10 permit any
access-list 11 permit 192.168.0.0
access-list 11 permit any
access-list 12 permit 172.16.216.0
access-list 12 permit any
dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit
dialer-list 1 protocol ipx permit
route-map toplant1 permit 10
match ip address 1
set ip next-hop 172.16.216.2
!
route-map toplant1 permit 20
match ip address 2
set interface Ethernet0/0
!
!
!
line con 0
exec-timeout 0 0
transport input none
line aux 0
line vty 0 4

login
!
end

plant2#

 

[ITlackey]

well, it turns out that the switch on one side had a bad port that went un-marked. I am new to cisco IOS (at least on this level) and so naturally assumed it was my config (which sometimes it was). Replace the switch, change some classful config settings and presto-chango, we have a point to point link. We still need to test all of the services on either side, but that should be a fairly minor affair.

I got so pre-occupied in my own thinking that I did not walk through the rest of the trouble shooting tree. Happens to all of us I suppose. Thanks again to everyone who helped me wake up and smell the roses.

 

[ITlackey]

though what still doesn't make sense, come to think of it, is why would I be able to telnet into the router from either side through those exact switches??? If the port was bad, I should 've had nothing. Its hard to say on these unmanaged jobbers , but never the less...wierd. Certainly a bad port wouldn't just block one service and not others. Have you run into this at all before?