Can you trust AUDIT feature within ASA? 2

[m0zart01]

Running audits using ASA...

When it returns the results:

coverage path xx is not used, etc.

Are all of these acurate and safe to remove?
Has anyone had any issues when using the AUDIT feature within ASA?

Thanks.

 

[SF0751]

The one thing I can think of is that the audit usually doesn't correctly report on remote entries in coverage paths (r1, r2, etc).

I still use the Audit function every 2-3 months but I manually check out the results before I clean things out.

Susan
"'I wish life was not so short,' he thought. 'Languages take such a time, and so do all the things one wants to know about.'"
- J. R. R. Tolkien, The Lost Road

 

[m0zart01]

Thx for the info, I have been checking them manually as well

I was hoping it would be a sure thing

 

[NX01]

I use it but also check the findings. Do a export of your stations and then filter by coverage paths and see if anyone has the coverage path in question. Or you can see what is so special about them. If nothing is special about them, you can do a find and replace in ASA and replace them with a generic coverage path.

In the future everything will work...