Please don't disparage "consultants" so strongly -- we're all not as ill-informed or irresponsible as those you folks have had to put up with.
I'm sure you are correct, I think the majority of us have had a few negative experiences with consultants. I've done a bit of consulting, but I rarely charge for it because I would like to do the work for the customer so I don't feel I can charge for consulting if I have a product or service to sell. I generally encourage the customer to hire us to design/build them a solution. Allows us to work directly with them to get them what they want AND holds us liable for a complete functional system. Often the consultant approach seems to be to walk in, tell them they should do it this way, get paid (whether it works or not) and then we have to adjust it to make it work. It's just the way it works many times.
I appreciate your point about education, but I think the guys point is that the consultant is wrong. He is supposed to already be educated, and they are often like architects (not what you call willing to take constructive critisizm or correction).
I'm not in a real high static electricity area, but I know of one Lucent Definity switch and two Nortel Option 11's that are in carpeted rooms. Go figure.
One more suggestion, the NEC is a code not a standard, designed only to provide safe installations, not functional systems. The NFPA has mounds of codes, most of which are in the National Fire Code, I don't believe they are a standards approving body. States as well as local jurisdictions adopt various codes for enforcement, and many of them amend or modify the NEC.
Forgive me, it's 5 am and BC (before coffee) but what the heck is an SCS? I did a quick search of the EIA/TIA standards, but no match. It is only my opinion, based on my experience and education...I am always willing to learn, educate me!
Daron J. Wilson, RCDD
daron.wilson@lhmorris.com