Your question is a bit vague, but I'll attempt to answer it. If you have a network statement under rip v1 for any 10.X.X.X (the x's can be anything, it doesn't matter) it will automatically convert it to the classfull 10.0.0.0 and advertise that it has a router to that. You can sit there and type 10.0.1.0, 10.0.2.0, ect, ect, but it will do nothing. If you have two interfaces (serial/ethernet/anything - it makes no difference) that are 10.1.1.1, and 10.1.2.1 or even 10.1.1.0 and 10.2.1.0, rip isn't going to recognize them as different networks. The local router it's self will route correctly, but rip won't and other routers will only see a classfull 10.0.0.0/8.
This is exactly the kind of thing you should know cold for the BSCI. I remember the BSCI being quite evil - they will never ask you if you should use ripv1 or ripv2. (Obviously, the best answer is ripv2) I never had a question like that on the BSCI - they think that's just too simple! They will assume you KNOW that ripv1 is the wrong answer, but they will want you to explain something else like would v1 work and why.
That is just an example of their evil thinking- I don't think they really asked me that exact question. To answer that question, yes, it would work as long as all 10.X.X.X networks were limited to that router and nowhere else - it would advertise a classfull 10.0.0.0. The other routers would send everything to that router and it would route things non classfully once it got there via the connected routes in the routing table. Does this answer your question?
Dang, I have the CIT on Wednesday and I can hardly remember this BSCI stuff - I'm in trouble!