Mike said:
Why should the search bots keep a secret (your secret)?
Yes, because the site is mine and google is indexing it. At this point google and I are providing a service to the visitors... What we share is our business. In a way google and I are in business together where google get to use our content to play ads to the visitor while we may get a subscription.
Mike said:
It is not in their interest to present pages in their search results that users can't access.
If we have absolute content (hidden or not) that is relevant to the search terms, IT IS in google's best interest to let their visitors know about it. In fact, they would be doing their visitors a dis-service if they did not let them know about the relevant content..
Olaf said:
So why want google to only secretly index that?
So google can inform their user that a positive match containing their search terms was found. They could even disclose the fact the indexed data came from a secured page if they choose.
Mike said:
The trouble is that you want it both ways. You want to exploit this powerful tool known as Google to promote your content - a tool that didn't cost you an ounce of effort to create and doesn't cost you a penny to use. But you also want to take all of the profit from the fees that your users pay to access the content. Maybe you need to review your business model.
Yes, the same as everyone else, plus we are helping google by giving them a platform to play their ads with our content. And our business model is very similar to most subscription sites including the New York Times...
Olaf said:
thread184-1553613: VFP like GOOGLE…
I solved that one 18 years ago with PHDBase coupled with another unique word (ie. category checkbox) and results were instant, even on the 650mb phd index file. When PHDbase searches, it first searches for the non wildcard matches first, then performs tha additional wildcard search on the results from the first retrieved record set. Lightening fast, and we still use it today in Win10 systems. I have several copies left in inventory...
Olaf said:
Why would anyone do that manually?
It has to be done manually because of its diversity. About 25 different unrelated categories and no uniform style of form... all ad-hoc.
Olaf said:
Only show the first 1000 chars, first 100 words...
This is what I'll probably end up doing, but maybe if I show the text in a light gray color on a white background. Not invisible, but close. I'm reading that one could get banned from the spiders if we put white text on a white background. But then why not create the summary page with the normal summary info in black print on a white background, then add the ocr text as white print on the white background...
Thanks,
Stanley