I have done this before using Access and it's string functions (INSTR, SUBSTR, LEFT, RIGHT) to parse the full name, but as Michael said, this is made more difficult when you add in Mr. and Mrs. or Jr. and Sr. I know I have read his posts before where he swears by NOT having a full name field and I agree with him. The minimal overhead it takes to handle the extra number of fields is far over shadowed by the ease of use in manipulating the data.
Durkin, it would be easier if we had a number, and for a while I think at least the U.S. was heading that way with the Social Security Number. But I think the fear of "just being a number" has slowly caused us to pull away from that. So now, instead of being one number and being able to associate all data with it, we have account numbers and pins for each account, drivers license numbers, SSN's, employee numbers, etc... It's a shame that even the best of ideas get contorted and skewed until they are dropped like pregnant chad on the ballot room floor...
Terry M. Hoey
th3856@txmail.sbc.com
Ever notice that by the time that you realize that you ran a truncate script on the wrong instance, it is too late to stop it?