Many moons ago I wrote an app in Access 2.0. It ran a packaging production line for one of the big mobile phone companies. The app had to capture each phone's barcoded Serial Number, at the rate of better than 1 per sec. Several million records per year.
Between shifts, the app would replicate the data to a master data file. It ran on, I think, an x386. This box had a power supply unit and a hard drive replaced, and they went through 2 or 3 displays until 2005.
Then IT stepped in and introduced an 'enterprise' system, which amongst other functionality, replaced my app. They spent ~$3M, and nearly a year to sort it out. The factory schedule became a disaster.
I wonder what the TCO (total cost of ownership) of that one x386 box and one Access 2.0 app would be?
Step up to the current day, and what do I find? Quite a few large corporate clients still using Office 97. They simply didn't buy into M$'s 'productivity' and 'TCO' claims.
So, it's not unusual for me to develop in A97 and migrate the app to A2000/2003 when the client has a mixed environment of 97/2000/2003.
And I won't embarrass myself by revealing the vintage of my own previously cutting-edge workstations (or was that bleeding-edge?). Suffice it to say you'd get a giggle.
Before I can move to A2007 - which I won't do until at least a couple of service packs - I'll have to spend major sums replacing pcs. Fortunately, many businesses are just as reluctant to spend huge $$$s replacing perfectly good pcs just so they can experience the wonders of Vista, Office 2007 (oh, and replacing or upgrading every other program they use that will not run under Vista).
Max Hugen
Australia