Actually, assuming that two disks each have the same individual MTBF, then having two disks instead of one doubles the chance of failure. Nevertheless, when a single failure occurs, the redundancy makes the fault tolerance provided by the second disk infinitely better, so the system is perceived as being more reliable, even though it has twice the expected failure rate!
Ah, the nuances of the reliability world! It is sometimes counter-intuitive.
Reliability engineers use numerous measures to identify meaningful utility parameters to meet different customer needs. Measures include MTBF, availability, mission completion rate, servicability, etc.
ek