Let me try this again. I have the following table with the following data.
Id1 Id2 Column1
1 2 A
1 2 B
1 2 C
1 3 A
1 3 B
1 3 C
1 4 A
1 4 D
1 4 E
The data is unique by having the groups of data. So for Id1 = 1, there is two unique sets of data, A,B,C and...
So I have a problem that I don't think is too rare but having a brain fart.
So I have multiple sets of data.
Id1 Id2 Column1
1 2 A
1 2 B
1 2 C
1 3 A
1 3 B
1 3 C
1 4 A
1 4 D
1 4 E
So I have a 1 unique set of id1=1 with A, B, C and another uniquie set of...
Found it
SELECT OBJECTPROPERTY (<object_id>,'TableFulltextChangeTrackingOn')
SELECT OBJECTPROPERTY (<object_id>,'TableFulltextBackgroundUpdateIndexOn')
You can find the object ids from the sysobjects table. If the query returns a 1, that means it is on, a 0 means it is off.
I had a similar problem. Our data on server A was on a SAN and Server B had it on just a local raid array. Server B would be a lot quicker than server A. The issue turned out to be that they stripped the SAN incorrectly. Meaning, the partion had multiple strips on the same disks. So instead of...
I have a table and I want to see if full text change tracking is enabled? Where do you check this?
Also, how would you check to see if auto propagation for the background update index is on as well?
Thanks for the quick reply.
I was looking into a CPU issue when I noticed how much CPU the incremental populations were taking for resources. It jumps it to about 80-90 percent cpu when running and only 15-20 percent cpu when it is idle.
Those are good ideas as I was thinking similar things...
Is it possible to move the MSSEARCH.EXE service off our production server to a 2nd (SQL) server so we can distribute the CPU and I/O of the incremental populations that are going on for the full text indexes? We are seeing high CPU usage and I/O from the loads we are doing throughout the day...
They are stripped drives and I was told we do not share on the same physical disk. We are also using powerpath software so it is load balanced. Do you mean load balanced on the Sym?
I am running some comparisons on a HP ML570 box. We have one 36gb (8GB luns, 0+1) drive on the company EMC Symmetrix attached by two emulex 9802 fibers with powerpath. We also have 400GB drive with 8 x 72gb 15k local attach scsi disks running a raid 5. When I run comparisons, the local attached...
It works once I give IUSR permissions on the remote server to the directories I need to go after. I still have some questions though.
What is the point of Virtual directories then if you can just put in the UNC path ie
<%
set oFso=Server.CreateObject("Scripting.FileSystemObject")
For...
I have the following code
<BODY>
The path of the virtual directory is <% Response.Write Server.MapPath("VD_Path\SQL") %>
<%
set oFso=Server.CreateObject("Scripting.FileSystemObject")
For Each oFile In oFso.GetFolder(Server.MapPath("VD_PATH\SQL")).Files...
I am moving data out of a table using BCP to a file and then loading it back into a different table using BCP. I am moving about 5 million to 10 million per call. The data gets to the file quick enough (5-10 mins). The problem is with the load. It loads about 95 percent of the data, then it...
Robomon is a application that can monitor the Event log and send SNMP traps or emails to certain people if a certain event occurs and posts to the event log. The maker of the software is heroix.
We are currently on a EMC SAN solution and the disk partitions get presented to our server. I heard of a way through windows to take two SAN partitions and concatenate them to one logical drive. Is this possible and how is it done? Thanks.
Found out it was that the metavolume was on the same set of disks twice/three times. The original disk we were on, did not "loop" back on the same disks. Would this cause a large performance decrease? What is the typical size for a hypervolume?
thanks for the quick reply
They are using striping for sure and I think they are using metavols. What are the common mistakes made when configuring this?
We are on a EMC Symmetrix and have been running great for over a year. We were running low on space, so we added a 550GB drive. When we copied our SQL Server database over to the drive, we lost about 40% in performance from the drive we were on (250GB) drive. We are using only one HBA (LP8000)...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.