Recent content by gadgie

Anybody out there know how to enable/disable the PSU in slot 1 on the ASR 903. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in Advance Gadgie

Unfortunately a server is not an option. Thanks for posting AJ1982, I think splitting the subnets will be the answer for now. Cheers

Sorry AJ1982, I forgot to say that they are not stacked, they are connected by two seperate DOT1Q trunks between two buildings, they also each have a layer 3 connection to our main router R1. Regards

Guy's I was wondering if it is possible to configure HSRP to also include DHCP as a standby also. I currently have 2 3750's, MLS1 & MLS2 that are configured with HSRP on Vlan's 2 & 4. MLS1 currently acts as a DHCP server for both these Vlans. Would it be possible to configure MLS2 to take...

Ladies/Gents, Please take a look at figure 32-6 in the following Cisco documentation. http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/metro/me3400/software/release/12.2_25_ex/configuration/guide/swiprout.html#wp1319583 My question regarding implementing VRF's is this. According Cisco's own...

Thanks for replying Brianinms. I have spoken with Cisco regarding this matter and apparently a REP segment can be closed with a l2protocol tunnel. However this doesnt help me as the L3 switch I am using (ME3400) wont support this. Back to the drawing board. Cheers.

Hi Brianinms, Sorry to pester you, To close the rep segment via the ubiquitous cloud, do i need to enable some form of layer 2 tunnel to allow REP updates to be passed over the ip link between the two edge ports. Without one I dont see how the traffic will be rerouted on a link failure.

Thanks brianinms. I know this might be the wrong part of the forum but does the connected router require any form of special configuration to carry the REP updates ie VPN, Dot1q tunnel, etc. Cheers

H There, I am looking for a bit of information regarding Cisco's REP. I am trying to find out if it possible to close a REP segment using an IP pathway between two routers. Looking at some of the documentation on the Cisco website it looks like it is possible but there is no detailed...

Burt, Changing the port type of the trunk to the 2801, to nni, has nailed it. Can ping and access the switch from all Vlan's. Although i still cant access from ports on the switch that are in VLAN1 unless the port is set nni, this suits me as I dont neccesarily want to be able to do that...

Burtsbees, I had a look at the trunk port, the default encapsulation on the ME3400 is DOT1Q. If I do a sh int trunk, the encapsulation is showing DOT1Q on fa 0/1. As i said i can put devices into VLAN1 and have them ping each other and the GW for that subnet. Just cant explain why I cant acess...

vipergg, I have tried pinging the switch from a device in Vlan1 doesnt work, but I can ping the GW for the subnet from that device, its totally weird. As for the auto summary, this is a bench setup so havent changed it yet. Cheers Merry Xmas

Thanks for the quick response Dallas. I have left the office now for a few days for xmas. I will post flash output when back on Sat. Look forward to your thoughts Merry Xmas

Guys, I posted yesterday with a inter vlan problem between my ME3400 switch and 2801 router. i have that sorted now i can ping between all Vlans including vlan1. The problem i have now is that I cannot ping the management ip or access via telnet, from either the router or any of the devices...

Cheers Burt I been staring at this screen for hours, didnt even notice i had missed the encapsulation on the trunk. Thanks again.