Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!
Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!
-
Congratulations Rhinorhino on being selected by the Tek-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!
limit on number of 4424 sets?
- Thread starter DJTelco
- Start date
- Thread starter
- #3
The customer could use 6424's which are not subject to the same restriction.
The 4424 issue is with IP Office only. There are similar restrictions on 4450 units (max 2 per module).
The problem relate both to power supply and to the switch software. Rumour is that the call appearance features in the forthcoming IP Office 3.0 include beefed up handling of high density lamp activity though I haven't seen that confirmed yet.
The 4424 issue is with IP Office only. There are similar restrictions on 4450 units (max 2 per module).
The problem relate both to power supply and to the switch software. Rumour is that the call appearance features in the forthcoming IP Office 3.0 include beefed up handling of high density lamp activity though I haven't seen that confirmed yet.
- Thread starter
- #6
Still trialing so still a moving target (as always with IP Office software).
The thread contained a good cut'n'paste of what was intended to be in 3.0.
The thread contained a good cut'n'paste of what was intended to be in 3.0.
- Thread starter
- #9
With so many new features, I wonder what the feature / bug ratio will be?
I hope there will be a good solid stable 2.* release prior to the 3.0. That will give us a stable rev to use for new installations between now and the resolution of all the new 3.0 bugs that no doubt will exist.
So far, in my exposure to the IPO product, it seems like each install is beta testing.
How many installs have you guys/gals done that were not "money pits" as far as sinking tons of nonbillable time to resolve bugs after the initial cutover?
djtelco
I hope there will be a good solid stable 2.* release prior to the 3.0. That will give us a stable rev to use for new installations between now and the resolution of all the new 3.0 bugs that no doubt will exist.
So far, in my exposure to the IPO product, it seems like each install is beta testing.
How many installs have you guys/gals done that were not "money pits" as far as sinking tons of nonbillable time to resolve bugs after the initial cutover?
djtelco
- Thread starter
- #10
- Status
Similar threads
