×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR COMPUTER PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you a
Computer / IT professional?
Join Tek-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Tek-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Using STP on LAN's

Using STP on LAN's

Using STP on LAN's

(OP)
At my job, we've recently deceided to go from
UTP to STP in the 2-15 node LAN's that we build
for clients because of recent problems. Having disagreements with co-workers about Grounding.
I feel (from my limited electronical knowledge)
that it makes more sense to only use the shield at
one end of the cable, rather than possibly include a
potential between grounds in buildings electrical
wiring. I haven't seen a difference as of yet
either way. Does anyone have an answer?

RE: Using STP on LAN's

I may be wrong but I may be right. But I think when you ground two shields you create an antennae and this antennae will start to grab noise and other interference throughout the loop.

RE: Using STP on LAN's

Neff is correct. You do not want to ground both ends. This will only make the noise problem bigger. Ground only at the hub end. This way you can grab all the drains from the cable and wrap them together to ground them.

RE: Using STP on LAN's

I find it interesting that you are using STP when the TIA specs doesnt really support it and the gentleman who is the primary designer of the verious CAT levels doesnt recommend it. The biggest problem is that STP by itself doesnt do anything but cause serious installation issues. You need to use shield boxes, connector and so on for it really work right or it can make the problem even worse. The problem is in how TWP cancels out noise by allowing a certain amount of signal to "escape" from the wire and then cancel itself out on the return side. This is grossly simplified When you wrap a shield around the wire, unless it "Drains" correctly, it will introduce MORE noise into the signal by reflections then by the outside source.
Just for the record, Lucent CAT5 TWP and punch system was tested to 650Mhz for the European Market which up this point had insisted on STP due to emitted RF concerns. If wanted I can dig up the various links to papers and whatnot if you really want to pursue this. I had this same dicussion with the engineers at Siemens who were insisting that I install STP. After serveral "discussions" they relented and my TWP is working just fine.


Whitepaper by Paul Kish ( developer of CAT3,4,5)
http://www.nordx.com/public/htmen/pdf/cablwhpap.pdf

White paper discussing UTP vs. STP and EMC directive
http://www.anixter.com/techlib/vendor/cabling/attutp.htm

Standards Watch for Gig over UTP
http://www.broadband-guide.com/cim/standards/stand0298.html

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Tek-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Tek-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Tek-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Tek-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login

Close Box

Join Tek-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical computer professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Tek-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close