×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR COMPUTER PROFESSIONALS

Contact US

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you a
Computer / IT professional?
Join Tek-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Tek-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Row count for table after filtering

Row count for table after filtering

Row count for table after filtering

(OP)
Hello,

I have run into an issue with counting the number of visible rows in a table after it has been filtered. I can get the total row count but not the visible rows only.

I've tried several methods as well, but everything that I've research uses a column range like "A2:A" which isn't helpful in this cause since the name of the table's column is dynamic.


Worksheet Nam variable example: part_path_worksheet_name
Table Name variable example: part_path_number_table
Column Name: "Part Path"
Total row count unfiltered without column header: 510
Expected row count after without column header filter: 40

I do not use the total column row count - 1 method since the .ListsObjects method works for the normal column count.

Filter Code:

CODE

ThisWorkbook.Sheets(part_path_worksheet_name).ListObjects(part_path_number_table).Range.AutoFilter Field:=rules_finish_length_min_index, _
        Criteria1:=rules_finish_length_min_value 

one of the row count codes I've tried:

CODE

rule_finish_length_min_result_count = ThisWorkbook.Sheets(part_path_worksheet_name).ListObjects(part_path_number_table).Range("part_path_number_table[Part Path]").SpecialCells(xlCellTypeVisible).Rows.Count 

I figure that it is a simple solution that I am overlook. My Google Foo has been a little off recently.

Thanks for the help,

Mike

RE: Row count for table after filtering

Why not just use countif()?

RE: Row count for table after filtering

There is no dedicated property of range or list object that returns number of hidden/visible records. A slight simplification: replace Range("part_path_number_table[Part Path]") by DataBodyRange:
... .ListObjects(part_path_number_table).DataBodyRange.SpecialCells(xlCellTypeVisible).Rows.Count

combo

RE: Row count for table after filtering

(OP)
Hi Combo,

Thanks for always being there to help out.

I might have entered this incorrectly since the return value was 3 instead of 40. Could you check this and let me know if I made an error?

CODE

rule_finish_length_min_result_count = ThisWorkbook.Sheets(part_path_worksheet_name).ListObjects(part_path_number_table).DataBodyRange.SpecialCells(xlCellTypeVisible).Rows.Count 



hi mintjulep,

The table has a dynamic name captured in other sections of the code. There are several table names that could be returned. countif() as a application formula isn't as flexible for this particular instance.



Mike

RE: Row count for table after filtering

ThisWorkbook.Sheets(part_path_worksheet_name).ListObjects(part_path_number_table).DataBodyRange.Rows.count
returns 510, as expected?

combo

RE: Row count for table after filtering

(OP)
Yes it does Combo

RE: Row count for table after filtering

A Star for Combo...?

---- Andy

"Hmm...they have the internet on computers now"--Homer Simpson

RE: Row count for table after filtering

(OP)
Hi Andy,

The filtered results isn't working correctly. When Combo's code is run, the total column count is the result instead of the filtered result.

Unfortunately it is still showing the incorrect result.

The correct result should have resulted in 40 out of 510.

RE: Row count for table after filtering

(OP)
I found something that seems to be working.

CODE

rule_finish_length_min_result_count = ThisWorkbook.Sheets(part_path_worksheet_name).ListObjects(part_path_number_table).DataBodyRange.Columns(part_path_index).SpecialCells(xlVisible).Cells.Count 

xlVisible seems to be the key difference as well as calling out a specific column (part_path_index).

Even if the column does not have a value, but the row still exists, the row will still be counted.

Thank you everyone!

Link to article with the steps I followed: Link

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Tek-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Tek-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Tek-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Tek-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Close Box

Join Tek-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical computer professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Tek-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close