top down vs bottom up top down vs bottom up mrcamo (Programmer) (OP) 4 Apr 10 13:42 Could someone explain to me the difference between top down and bottom up data warehousing approaches?are star schemas bottom up where as data cubes are top down?any help would be appriciated RE: top down vs bottom up MDXer (TechnicalUser) 5 Apr 10 14:46 In my experience Top Down is where you start with Reports that need to be filled. These in turn dictate the design of your cube, data mart and underlying relational schema. Bottom up is starting with a list of capabilities that are needed which you then can build your Relational schema off of then cube and reports.In my experience top down is faster initially because you can quickly meet the needs of the orginization, but typically forces a design that may not be as flexible making expanding the capabilities of the solution more difficult. It is an easy trap to get caught up in. My experience leads me to believe you get forced in a top down method when people do not understand the technology or methodology and are unwilling or unable to learn.I find myself quickly going from a bottom up to Top down environment yet again. RE: top down vs bottom up mrcamo (Programmer) (OP) 7 Apr 10 11:59 so it is incorrect to refer to data cubes as top down and data marts (star schemas) as bottom up?by this do you mean that regardless to the architecture (data cube/ start schema) each have related top down and bottom up methodologies? RE: top down vs bottom up MDXer (TechnicalUser) 7 Apr 10 14:24 not so much a methodology as what you include. If you build from the report aspect you are likely to only fit the needs of those reports. If you start with here is the the business need we are trying to build for you will probably end up with a more robust design, that includes the immediate needs but also some people have not yet considered. RE: top down vs bottom up mrcamo (Programmer) (OP) 7 Apr 10 14:51 just to confirm , is it incorrect to say that data cubes are a top down approach and star schemas are a bottom up approach? RE: top down vs bottom up MDXer (TechnicalUser) 7 Apr 10 16:36 For me I would say it is more correct to say that. Cubes are A top level entity the star schema supports the cube so I see the star schema as the bottom. RE: top down vs bottom up mrcamo (Programmer) (OP) 7 Apr 10 18:32 is it not possible to apply top down and bottom up methods to the design of cubes ? and at the same time apply top down and bottom up methods to the design of star schemas. My point is that I am trying to write a document which describes the difference between top down and bottom up techniques, and am unsure weather to label cubes as top down and stars as bottom up..