×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR COMPUTER PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you a
Computer / IT professional?
Join Tek-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Tek-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Legato backup hardware

Legato backup hardware

Legato backup hardware

(OP)
We are looking to buy Legato and use a StorageTek L700 tape library for our Unix and NT backup solution.  We are looking to both HP and Sun for a server to run 10 DLT 7000 tape drives.  Sun is proposing a E4500 list cost $160K and HP is proposing an L2000 list cost $60K.  Something is wrong.  Is Sun over bidding or is HP under bidding ???  Any experience with either would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks,
  MM

RE: Legato backup hardware

You have a huge library.  The question is, are you planning to backup local data, or data from servers on the network?

Assuming that you are backup off of a network connection, you would need to consider how much bandwidth you have.  Suppose you have a 100 mbps connection.  With each DLT7000 drives being able to write at least 5MBps native, and most 10 MBps, you would fill-up the network bandwith with 2 drives (2 drives x 10 Megabytes/s x 8 bits/bytes = 160 mbps).

Why do you have to consider this?  Networker can do parallelism.  The more bandwith you have, the more drives you have, the more parallelism you can run, the stronger the server you would need.

An E4500 is more scalable than the L2000. Plus, Sun support contract is a whole lot cheaper than HP.  I would use Sun with Legato, and HP with HP Omniback.

RE: Legato backup hardware

(OP)
  We plan to use Gigabit network to backup the data from other machines.  I also would favor Sun since Legato is developed on Sun, but it is difficult to justify spending an additional $100K on scalability.

RE: Legato backup hardware

A word of advice,

Money is usually one (if not the only) criteria that some companies look at when deciding on implementation of technologies. That said, you need to address your goals as an organization.

What level of data protection to do you require? I assume since you are going with Legato, then you are pretty serious about your backups.

What is the estimated backup/recover window? If you need lightening fast backups, and fast recoveries, then you'll need to spend the money on Hardware (ie a high powered server, and equally strong storage devices).

What is the cost associated with downtime to your organization's information? If they are mission critical, then the extra 100K shouldn't be an issue.

Sounds like the people who are making the decisions, aren't going to be the one's who are going to have deal with the ringing phone when data availability times need to be met.

Spend the $$$'s now, and you'll be able to relax (somewhat).

My $0.02

Helios3

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Tek-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Tek-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Tek-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Tek-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login

Close Box

Join Tek-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical computer professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Tek-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close