==>
Let the numbers do the talking...
Martin,
The problem that I have with CPUbenchmark.net is that the information they provide about the benchmark is extremely vague. Unless I am able to understand what benchmark results go into that final score, I have to write it off as unreliable. To me, it looks like only 1 benchmark which you and I know never tells the whole story. Also a lot of links on there redirect you to their product page encouraging you to benchmark your own PC with their software (which isn't free). Perhaps accuracy and objectivity isn't their primary goal here.
Now I understand it's hard to find sites that have up-to-date benchmark scores on mobile processors these days. However, I finally did come across one that's pretty close:
You'll see the Phenom II N850 in the list, but there aren't any scores next to it. The Phenom II N830 does have scores, however. Check that one along with the Core i3-330M, then back at the top check "Cinebench R11.5" (which is unchecked by default) and select "Restrict". Although there are different tests I'd rather see, the scores give a more complete picture. With the exception of the outdated 3DMark06, the i3 330M wins easily in every other benchmark against the N830. Really this should come as no surprise. The benchmarks probably aren't taking advantage of the 3rd core on the Phenom II processor (which is the only real advantage it has over the dual-core i3). Plus it loses on paper in every other category - has half the L2, doesn't have L3, can only handle 3 threads simultaneously (i3 can do 4).
Like I said before though, it really depends on what kind of software is going to be used on the laptop. If you're not really going to stress the system, then the AMD Phenom II is likely going to be the better buy. But for every ounce of performance between those two, I'd go with the i3 or a faster Phenom II.
~cdogg
"
Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results." - Einstein
[tab][navy]For posting policies, click [/navy]
here.