Hi
I'm trying to set up an environment using a Win2003 DNS as primary server and a Linux-based Bind (unsure of the version but it isn't the newest installation) as a secondary DNS. I get the zone transfers to work just fine but there seems to be some problem with how the different servers interpret the records.
The Win DNS zone [ex12345.zone.com] is setup in the following way:
ex12345. A 192.168.0.1
server. CNAME ex12345.
www. CNAME ex12345.
This file is transfered to the Bind server looking exactly the same. The . at the end of each host is automatically added by the Win DNS. If I recall it correctly the . will tell the Bind server that it is the complete hostname and thus it will not add the rest of the words, in this case ex12345.zone.com. Is this correct?
The question in short:
The Win DNS will interpret the server name as ex12345.ex12345.zone.com while the Bind DNS interpret it as ex12345. Is this correct? If yes, which one is right according to the RFC?
T.I.A.
/Tommy
I'm trying to set up an environment using a Win2003 DNS as primary server and a Linux-based Bind (unsure of the version but it isn't the newest installation) as a secondary DNS. I get the zone transfers to work just fine but there seems to be some problem with how the different servers interpret the records.
The Win DNS zone [ex12345.zone.com] is setup in the following way:
ex12345. A 192.168.0.1
server. CNAME ex12345.
www. CNAME ex12345.
This file is transfered to the Bind server looking exactly the same. The . at the end of each host is automatically added by the Win DNS. If I recall it correctly the . will tell the Bind server that it is the complete hostname and thus it will not add the rest of the words, in this case ex12345.zone.com. Is this correct?
The question in short:
The Win DNS will interpret the server name as ex12345.ex12345.zone.com while the Bind DNS interpret it as ex12345. Is this correct? If yes, which one is right according to the RFC?
T.I.A.
/Tommy