AES and CM have that configuration on both systems. So, in "change ip-services" you enable AES with node-name - it's kinda like DNS where a logical name in CM maps to the IP of AES and a switch password.
Then, in CM, you add cti-link 1.
On AES, you comfigure the switch password in the DMCC config - which must match what's in ip-services in CM - and you configure the CTI link number in the TSAPI config which must correlate to a CTI link you built in CM.
So, the short answer is to check how many AES's you have - in display ip-services - and then log in to those AES's and check their TSAPI configuration to see which CTI link number they correspond to.
Your station/agent isn't sending data. CM is sending it to AES. CM is sending it because AES put up a TSAPI monitor on your station, and AES did that because the app asked it to.
Here's an example:
Let's say it's a bank that always tried selling you life insurance when you call for anything. Old Verint would toss up a TSAPI for every agent/station configured in Verint. With newer Verint, you'd have a login/logout skill in CM which doesn't receive any calls, but all agents are a part of it. Verint tosses 1 TASPI monitor up on that skill and then AES will send Verint all the login/logout messages from the agents. Verint will then toss up a TSAPI monitor on all the logged in agents.
Based on your recording configuration, you might only record calls to certain VDNs, so you might monitor those too.
Now let's say that bank has 2 recorders - one for customer service to listen to the whole call and another for the compliance department because they just want the recording of the insurance terms and agreement that is configured to only record when the agent calls a VDN for that specific purpose.
The agent's call with the customer has been recorded from the start based on what I said previously. To record the verbal contract, the agent might say "i'll bring us onto a secure line" and then conference in a VDN made for that purpose. The 2nd recorder for compliance is monitoring that particular VDN by TSAPI and when it sees agent 1234 call it, that recorder might then invoke TSAPI through the same or a different AES and make a single-step-conference to that compliance recorder. That means 2 recorders can be recording the same call at the same time for potentially different purposes.
Consider how many calls are up in this case. One to the agent from the customer. 2 for the conference to the recorder. 3 for the conference to the recording VDN. 4 for the conference to the 2nd recorder.
Could you do that with service observe recording instead of SSC? Sure, since CM 5.1 you can have 2 service observers on a call. The recorders could do that. But what if the supervisor wants to use that feature too? If the supervisor wants to listen in to the agent's call while they're on with the customer, if it was before the insurance sale, then the insurance recording would fail, and if it was during the recording of the insurance contract, then the supervisor's attempt would fail.
Single Step Conference allows more flexibility for more applications to record stuff.
Now imagine this bank is also using a custom app to control the phone - like some agent desktop application. They talk on the physical phone, but they have some integration on their PC to not use One-X Agent. That's another app, another TSAPI license. You can have up to (if I recall...) 6 monitors on a station live at once.
So, there's a nice little bit of information for you. But the real question is - why do you care?
It doesn't matter which CTI link is invoking it. What problem are you trying to diagnose?
Here's an example of what might be a problem: A typical CM phone has 3 call appearances. It can have more, but the default is 3. The default is also to reserve the last one for conference/transfer. That means you can have 1 call live and 1 on hold and you're not allowed picking the last call-appearance to make a 3rd call. It's saved in case you want to transfer one of the other callers to another number - you need another line/call-appr to do that.
Now let's say you didn't restrict the last call-appr and 2 were in use and a call came in that needed to be recorded. The call from the customer would be call # 3 and you'd have no more call appearances left to invoke a conference - by single step or otherwise - and the recording would fail in that case.
So, what broke?
