Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!
Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!
-
Congratulations wOOdy-Soft on being selected by the Tek-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!
Upgrade to Access 2000 necessary?
- Thread starter BanditLV
- Start date
Depends!
On the number of objects,
On the size of your database,
On the number of concurrent users,
On you current design (is it adequate),
User requirements,
Complexity and effort required to upgrade,
etc.
Let me make a couple assumptions, which we must do you make any useful recommendations. First, you have a front end (client)/back end (server) configuration; second, the data is probably being updated by a number of concurrent users; third, you are probably experiences periods of slow response (but users are patient). It is a misnomer to say Access 97 implements a client/server design because it doesn't. If you were to upgrade to Access 97 you could take advantage of server side stored procedures that could considerable improve response (again, depending).
Steve King
On the number of objects,
On the size of your database,
On the number of concurrent users,
On you current design (is it adequate),
User requirements,
Complexity and effort required to upgrade,
etc.
Let me make a couple assumptions, which we must do you make any useful recommendations. First, you have a front end (client)/back end (server) configuration; second, the data is probably being updated by a number of concurrent users; third, you are probably experiences periods of slow response (but users are patient). It is a misnomer to say Access 97 implements a client/server design because it doesn't. If you were to upgrade to Access 97 you could take advantage of server side stored procedures that could considerable improve response (again, depending).
Steve King
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
- Question
- Locked
- Question
- Locked
- Question